Thursday, November 12, 2009
Victims
equal opportunity victimisation
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Hangmen Also Die!
The obvious victims in Hangmen Also Die! are the Czech people. They are brutally controlled, hundreds of them rounded up and summarily murdered to try to extract information about the murder of Heydrich. However, for the American audience, I believe that the true victim is Freedom. Americans have an intrinsic connection with the idea and symbol of Freedom, which is obviously lacking in every sense in the film. The actors, due to their very clear American accents, also seem very familiar to the audience, while the Germans retain their “other” ness. This Americanization of the Czechs, the victims, reminds the audience of what could (would) happen if the Nazis were not defeated. While the United States had the protected barrier of the Atlantic Ocean, the audience member would have a difficult time not thinking of the dangers to the US due to the victimization of the Americanized Czechs.
The American People as (Pseudo) Victims
Victims in Hangmen Also Die
Victims of hangmen also die
Hangman Also Die
It's the Hat
Victims by choice
Are the Czech people victims in Hangmen Also Die? On the one hand, even though they are being tormented and executed, they seem to be willing to accept it as long as they stick together and refuse to reveal the identity of their hero. Victims are generally people who are suffering and miserable, who demand sympathy from the audience. Even when they are being beaten, they maintain their pride and accept the punishment. On the other hand, they are being killed for no reason and chosen at random.
Ultimately, I think that they are the victims in the film. Even though they are willing to die and turn the tables and become a sort of aggressor at the end, the Czech people are still relatively powerless and can never feel safe from random acts of violence and persecution. They also could be seen as victims of their own pride. Had they given up the one assassin, they could have saved hundreds of lives, but they are compelled to stick together and allow their peers to pay the price. Czaka is also a victim, even though he “deserved” what he got for being a traitor.
In the end, all of the Czech people are victims, even though they did have some sort of control over their destinies. If they are not victims in terms of being terrorized for no reason, they are victims of their own decisions and sacrifices.
Hangman Victims
Victorious Victims
The Victims in Hangmen
The “victims” intended by the filmmakers in Hangmen Also Die are unique because we, as Americans, so often are presented with anti-Nazi propaganda films that focus on the Nazi victims as the victims of racial stereotypes, as well as the Allies. However, in this film we are presented with Eastern European victims of the Nazi occupation. While the film definitely attempts to prove to audiences that all members of Czech society were victims of oppression under the Nazi regime, I thought that there seemed to be a particular emphasis on the suppression of intellectuals and professionals. This victimization in the film would have been particularly compelling for American audiences in 1943, a time at which Allied victory in the war was definitely not certain, for it reminded audiences that if the Nazis were successful in the war effort, the entire world would be subjected to their occupational terror. Instead of focusing on more lower-class or unfortunate victims of the Nazis, the filmmakers choose to present characters that are obviously members of the upper-middle class, and well respected in society. The occupations of Novotny and Svaboda, as a professor and a doctor respectively, would have resonated with Allied audiences due to the fact that these are generally two highly respected occupations within Western culture, and the individuals who hold such occupations are usually well-respected and leaders in society. By confronting the audience with two likable characters who would have appeared to be likely leaders within a community as direct victims of an unjust Nazi occupation would have furthered hostility towards the Third Reich as an irrational and backwards system, and would have instilled fear of a possible takeover from the Nazis on Allied soil, further bolstering support for the war effort on the home front.
Hangmen
A rather interesting dichotomy is created regarding the “victim” in the Hangmen also Die. While it is pretty apparent that the literal victims are the people of Czechoslovakia, figuratively thanks to an interesting portrayal of the Prague’s citizens Americans too appear to be victims of Nazi oppressors, inspiring a sentiment in US audiences that if the Nazis are not stopped this could easily become reality here. It is certainly clear that the Nazi occupying force is oppressing the people. The Nazis, rightly so, are unmerciful and ruthless, taking lives as if it were nothing. In this capacity the Czech people become martyrs for the cause of freedom. Individual characters like Professor Novotny are clearly victims, but they are made to be emblematic of the whole of society. The Czechoslovakians impressively do their best to fight back in any way possible, resistance lead by the underground movement is indicative of that. Moreover, very literally the idea of a “resistance” makes them by definition victims of an attack. Within the film there are evidently individualized victims like the Novotnys, but there is also the collective victim of the unnamed Czechoslovakina people (typified by the men executed from the barracks).
However, while this is easily readable by viewers it quickly becomes evident that the Czechoslovakians are entirely Americanized. Whether it be the “Czechoslovakian” cab driver speaks with a quite thick New York accent or the younger brother who might as well be a character on Leave It to Beaver, these people are personified not as European but as American. The purpose of this clearly to make the audience feel akin to their Eastern European counterparts, who prior to the war most in the United States likely felt little connection to. Additionally, by characterizing the Czechoslovakians in such an American way it evokes a feeling of personal attack for theatergoers. The Novotnys might as well be the family down the street. The lack of an effort at mimicking accents on the part of the people of Prague made it so that what was Prague in the movie could just as easily be Chicago or Atlanta. The personalization of the victims during the time likely proved more effective in stirring up the desire to fight back against the oppressors.
The Dangling Chain of Hangmen
The rest of the film simply continues with this attempt to hand off the victim role. Each party, whether a single individual or a collective group, is forced into such a corner that defense is no longer an option. There is only the choice to unleash offense on someone else. Even when Czaka meets his cold end and it appears that the Czechs are successful in framing him, the movie shows that the Nazis have only allowed this fake conclusion in order to break the cycle, which in spite of it still remains unbroken. In the end, they surrender just as well as victims to this struggle, having no escape themselves but to call out a fake case closing in order to cover things. The Czechs, despite their terrible struggle as well, find their efforts ultimately to be in vain. When both sides are unable to successfully stick the victim position on the other, they both turn and prosecute the man in between the two as the final resort.
What is a “victim”?
But the Czeck people turn the table and make the hunter become the hunted: the final victim is Emil Cruka. Thinking of victim in the way that you are punished for something you haven’t done, it becomes obvious that he, too, is a victim as he is punished for killing Heydrich even though it wasn’t him. But still most people would tend to see him not as a victim but see his death as the moral ending of the movie as he was not only a traitor but did not even show remorse for his actions and was not sorry for seeing all his comrades being murdered. But still he is a victim of the Czech people and he, too, is murdererd for reasons he is not responsible for.
Wide-Spread Victimization in Hangmen Also Die
One Czech that does not appear entirely victimized by the Nazis is the brewer, Emil Czaka, who is instead presented as a traitor who goes behind the backs of his family and friends to profit by their misfortune. This argument, however, may not be enough to entirely validate the accusation that Czeka was not at all victimized, because it can be argued that he only did what he did to protect himself from the oppressive force controlling his surroundings. In this regard, perhaps, he can be seen as one of the film’s greatest victims, being forced to sacrifice his respectability to avoid impending troubles. His “victimization” is realized as his fellow Czechs catch on to what he has been doing and frame him for the assassination, thereby forcing him to pay for a crime he had nothing to do with. Again, this argument may be considering unconvincing due to Czeka’s role in the hostages’ arrests.
Regardless of how one views Czeka, the film has countless victims, many of whom are nameless characters simply recognized as individuals with little to no freedom and a constant threat looming over them. This allows for the assertion that the film suggests victims beyond the filmed plotline, simply presenting one example of the many populations being victimized by Nazi rule. With this in mind, it may be easier to reach a conclusion by plainly stating that the Nazis victimized everyone in their vicinity, and arguments can be made to include countless names on the list of the film’s victims.
Victims in Hangmen Also Die
So in all, yes, the Jews of Czechoslovakia are the victims the audience readily identifies with, however the Nazi's are the unseen victims as they have fallen prey to themselves.
A Victimized National Identity
Possible Victims
Another victim was the patriarchal family. The Novotny family is ripped apart by the crisis, and we are left uncertain (as far as I can tell, although some people may have seen it differently) as to whether Professor Novotny survived in the end. The central problem for Nasha Novotny is whether it is more important to save her father or to save a Czech hero in order to lift the spirits of the resistance. Indeed, the marriage plans of Nasha and Jan are destroyed or at least delayed by the crisis, meaning that the Nazis have attacked not only the Novotny family but this potential new family. There is also some tension about fulfilling bourgeois family norms, like making sure a man doesn’t sleep over so the neighbors won’t gossip.
Who is the Victim? Well, it depends...
Victims, Plural
I would conclude that there are multiple victims: those Czechs that were rounded up following the assassination of Heydrich and used as hostages to draw out the assassin. Although there are other characters that could be considered victims, the hostages were victims of random violence. Their capture was not a response to anything the hostages did; rather, it was the result of Dr. Franticek Svoboda’s (aka Karel Vanek’s) murder of “The Hangmen”.
I think it is easiest to point to the Czech’s held hostage as victims once other characters have been eliminated as possible victims. Svoboda is one character who suffered under Heydrich; however, Svoboda seemed relatively passive about preventing the deaths of the hostages. Although a victim at one time, Svoboda can no longer be classified as such following recklessness with the lives of others.
Another character who could be considered a victim is Emil Czaka, who is framed by the Czech public for the assassination of Heydrich. It is difficult to label Czaka as a victim, however, because of his role as a traitor for the Nazis. Rather than support his Czech comrades, Czaka turns on the citizens and provides names of those to be taken hostage. He is not deserving of the audience’s sympathy and thus cannot be considered a victim.
The Victim in Hangmen Also Die
When I first read this question, I thought that answering it would be quite easy. With so many characters in the film, it should be simple enough to pick at least one of them as the victim and make my case for that person. However, I find it to easy to simply say that "character so and so" is the victim because I don't entirely think the point of the film is to get you to make that move. Clearly, it could be argued that the 400 men who are arrested after Heydrichs assassination, in the film, are the victims...yet, Lang made sure to show that these men, for the most part, stood by their convictions to face Nazi brutality head on and accept their fate. This is no more evident than with Prof. Novotny who is prepared to face death for the principles he believes in, even though his family wants to save his life. Ultimately, it seems as though this film, in clearly distorting the events that happened in the wake of Heydrich's assassination, was trying to get the audience to recognize the need to stand up to the brutality of the Nazis at all costs. Even though the film may not be historically accurate, it still presents an obvious reality...the Nazis are brutal, and if someone does not stand up to them, there will simply be more innocent victims who have to suffer at their hands. I would argue, then, that the victim of the film is unnamed but clearly alluded too...the victim(s) are all of those people who have suffered and will continue to suffer at the hands of men like Heydrich and the Nazis. The "good guys" in the film are not victims because they are standing up to the Nazis. The "bad guys" are not victims because they are brutal killers who have total disregard for life. The victims are the people who suffer at the hands of the Nazis whom the Resistance is trying to protect.
I do feel the need to point out, though, that there were an incredible amount of victims who suffered as a result of the assassination of Heydrich. If one looks up the death of Heydrich (and I checked a few sources) they find that the Nazis went ballistic in the wake of his death, even murdering an entire Czech village...men, women, and children. Although this film may represent the need to stand up to the murderous regime of the Nazis, in doing so (assassinating a top SS official), thousands of other innocent people had to die.